All of these words apply but none of them really convey what I mean.
For example, when the play begins Nora is just returning home from a shopping trip. Previously, she made the decorations by hand, spending an entire day on the project.
Now that Nora belongs to a higher social class she practically throws money away. She tells the tree delivery boy to keep the change from the crown she gave him, paying him twice what he asks.
Now that they belong to a higher social class, her responsibility has flown out the door and she cares only for her own A doll house feminist essay.
By the end of the play, however, she realizes that even if she is able to be free of her debts, she is still financially enslaved to her husband, because as a woman she is completely dependant on him.
Torvald is much more careful with money, but he too bases his outlook on life and relationships solely on money and the status it earns him.
Torvald, too, equates money with freedom, and refuses to give up that freedom by borrowing money. Torvald cares not only about money, but about his social status as well. Nora is only an afterthought when it comes to his reputation. Their relationship is ruined because he continues to believe in money and social status as the source of happiness, while Nora comes to realize that money is not that important.
The Marxist theme can be seen in both Kristine and Krogstad as well. This is a Marxist attitude because her entire life and mind-set are a result of her economic situation at the time of her decisions.
She had to leave her home and her child in order to get by. She had to give up a relationship with someone she loved, just as Kristine had to give up her love for Krogstad.
So all she can expect is to be poor her entire life, and for her financial conditions to remain stagnant. The problems that Nora, Anna-Marie and Kristine face are compounded by their gender. She was an object, his property, to whom he designed to give life; but only for his own pleasure.
When he finally addresses her by name, in Act Three, her behavior is entirely different—she becomes serious, determined, and willful. All of it is a role that Nora has been taught to play by society, the behavior expected of all women of the time.
Ibsen was even forced to change this ending in order for it to be performed. Obedience was the main trait that defined women; it was what separated them from men. So in leaving, she was in a sense denying the purpose of her existence.
Women had no other role or function in society. Kristine broke free from this traditional role by chance, because her husband died.Feminist Art And The Feminist Movement - They believed that if they put the viewer in the shoes of a woman, then they would understand the struggles and the little freedom that women had.
BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. Whoa! That’s a really good essay, kind of scattered and intense but very interesting and thought-provoking. I agree that heterosexual love is inherently imbalanced, but why?
Dec 03, · NPR’s Book Concierge Our Guide To ’s Great Reads. by Nicole Cohen, David Eads, Rose Friedman, Becky Lettenberger, Petra Mayer, Beth Novey and Christina Rees – Published December 3, Moreover although Ibsen himself claimed that A Doll’s House was a humanist as opposed to a feminist text (7), I would argue that as with North and South, the.
The Barbie Chronicles: A Living Doll Turns Forty [Yona Zeldis McDonough] on schwenkreis.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A Thoroughly Grown-Up Look At A Twentieth-Century Muse Of Outstanding Proportions To some she's a collectible.